After deciding what I was going to do my paper zine on, I started thinking about what I'd want it to look like and what I wouldn't want it to look like. I did some searching on google for metal music magazines and fanzines to see what different styles there was out there...
When I searched for music fanzines, All that came up were cartoonified, hand made looking books like this, I personally don't want my book to look like this as I'd prefer to use real pictures rather than drawn ones or cartoons, I think the cover looks a tad too crowded and overall it doesn't really look very interesting as the colour scheme is too repetative and boring, theres nothing about it that makes me want to red the book which is what the front cover should do: it should inform you of whats inside and make the reader want to read it- Also I wanted my zine to look a lot more professional then this. Although I do like how the writing is placed everywhere in different ways and how it's also presented in different way(into an explosion drawing etc) and I like how the font's are changing all the time and putting emphasis on certain words more than others.
I then searched for metal music magazines and it came up with quite a variety of different styles for the covers: over all I can say that I don't relly like the look of most of the magazines at all, they were mostly cluttered and had too much on them, there were a few that I quite liked- the more simple ones that had a main picture, some writing and some extra things about whats inside; nothing too over crowded or busy.
I searched for articles after and came across these:
< I thought I could make some kind of logo/title that I could using throughout the book. I'd like something like this one, it's not boring and the colours work. I like the design of the background and I like how they didn't just write the two words as two words, they put them together. I also really like the bold font's and how the colour scheme is running throughout.
I looked at different metal CD covers since I'm making one for the band to use in my zine, All CD covers have the same aspects within them: The band name/logo, sometimes the album name, and there's always some artwork to go along with it- the artwork can be to do with what the albums about or it can just be something they think looks good and suits the band's image- it doesn't nessesarily have to be about the albums content.
< I really love the artwork/image on this cover- I think it's beautiful and the colours really stand out, it's really effective. I also rather like the logo although the first letter of the name is a little hard to make out- it's an F but it looks like a T - I'd defiantly have the logo to be clearly readable.
< I really like this cover because the colours work well together and stand out, the artwork is interesting and different and could have a connection with the album's con tent. I love how bold and clear the name of the band is and the placement of it, it's placed so that it also comes into the artwork at the 'T's'.
< One thing I hate about this cover and all others that do it, is how the name of the band is unreadable, I don't think theres much point in having a logo or name on anything if its not even readable. I do like the different-ness of the logo though and I really like the artwork and the colours- I like how everything is centred on the cover as well, it's easy on the eyes and brings focus in on the important aspects about the cover.
< This covers uses a real image, not a computer made image for it's artwork- I really like it as it stands out and make the entire cover look more real and effective- looks as if more effort has been put into it. On the other hand, I don't really like how the writing looks; so plain and boring compared to the image, and the colours of them don't match or go with the colours in the imagery- they mostly likely did this to make the writing stand out but it backfired on them as it stands out in a bad way. 

No comments:
Post a Comment